Sexting Can Be Dangerous For Teens

Sexting Can Be Dangerous For Teens.


Sexting is sending out sexually well-defined primer messages or photos by cellphone - is fairly common among teens, a green Belgian study finds in Dec 2013. And peer pressure, the analysis for romance and trust that the recipient will respond positively seem to be the key factors driving sexts. Adolescents look after to take a mostly benign view of the practice, the researchers found, dwelling little on the concealed for negative fallout down the road pakistani tips be auladi. Warnings by parents or teachers against the practice appear to fall on deaf ears, with many teens unconcerned about parental monitoring of their phones or the likely for blackmail or future risk to their reputation.



And "During adolescence, innocent people explore their sexuality and identity, and form different kinds of friendships, including their prime romantic relationships," said study lead author Michel Walrave, an confederate professor in the department of communication studies at the University of Antwerp. "In this setting sexting can be used to express their interest in a potential partner," to maintain intimacy while dating, to catch in "truth-or-dare" flirting or to earn bragging rights among peers bestpromed.org. The risk of unintended consequences is the problem.



So "As words and images sent can be surely copied and transmitted, sexting messages can like spread to audiences that were not intended by the sender of the message. This can ruin the standing of the depicted girl or boy, and lead to mockery or even bullying". The study appeared online in a new issue of the journal Behavior and Information Technology. The researchers conducted a written examination among nearly 500 Belgian girls and boys between the ages of 15 and 18 who were attending two unique secondary schools.



More than a quarter of the kids said they had sent out a sext during the two months unequalled up to the poll. Girls were found to have a generally more negative view of sexting than boys. However, boys and girls already in feasibly trusting relationships seemed relatively disposed to embrace a behavior they perceived - rightly or wrongly - as satisfying and desirable among their peers, the researchers found. The bottom silhouette is that any intervention aimed at curbing teen sexting needs to hail the overriding social environment.



That is, one in which risky, explicit communications with a high potential for blowback are viewed beyond question by friends and romantic partners. "Our study observed that especially the influence of peers is well-connected in predicting sexting behavior. Why? "Adolescents may be more focused on the short-term positive consequences of sexting, such as gaining publicity of a desired other, than on the possible underestimated short-term and long-term nullifying consequences. "Raising awareness at school could alert young people to the risks of sharing sexually hidden content with a romantic partner, especially if the romance sours".



Walrave also advised incorporating sexting-prevention efforts beyond sex-education programs. For exemplar it could also be addressed in programs specifically designed to target bullying and cyberbullying, given that sexts have the covert to become a bully's digital ammunition. One US expert expressed some frustration with the feature the study was conducted.



So "Overall, this article further illustrates that sexting behaviors resume to occur among adolescents, and therefore additional education of teens regarding the potential consequences is warranted," said Justin Patchin, co-director of the Cyberbullying Research Center. But at the same space the findings weren't clear-cut enough. "I am disappointed by the way sexting was measured in this study," said Patchin, who also is a professor of miscreant justice at the University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire.



And "The researchers wholly asked teens one question: 'Have you sent sexts in the last two months?'" he said. "They didn't inquire whether the teens had received sext messages, and they did not distinguish between text-based and image-based sexually definite content. Are we talking about pictures or just naughty talk? There is a big difference".



For her part, Shari Kessel Schneider, contemplate director for the Education Development Center in Waltham, Mass, focused on what can be done to cure teens make smarter decisions. Educators must accentuate the permanence of images placed online, and teach children to be resistant to peer pressure in general.



Whether it's about using drugs or sending a sext, educators should staff teens understand that not all their peers are doing it. Parental involvement is important," Kessel Schneider added. "First of all, parents essential to amplify their effort to teach children about the meaning of a digital footprint. Secondly, they need to proctor their teen's phone use price zetaclear. I just don't think a teen is as likely to send a sext if they conscious a parent is monitoring their phone regularly".

tag : sexting teens study among peers consequences researchers girls education

Post a comment

Private comment

No title

I know this site presents quality dependent posts and extra stuff, is there any other website which
gives such stuff in quality?

No title

Hi there friends, how is everything, and what you desire to say
regarding this piece of writing, in my view its truly remarkable in support of me.
Профиль

alejandrafalto

Author:alejandrafalto
Dr. Alejandra Falto

Новые записи
Новые комментарии
Новые трэкбэки
Архив по месяцам
Категории
Форма поиска
RSS ссылка
Ссылки
Формуляр приглашения в блог-друзья

Добавить автора в блог-друзья