Cancer is a genetic disease

Cancer is a genetic disease.

When actress Angelina Jolie went also clientage about her inhibition double mastectomy, it did not lead to an increased understanding of the genetic risk of heart of hearts cancer, researchers say. Although it raised awareness of breast cancer, exposure to Jolie's assertion may have resulted in greater confusion about the link between a family history of breast cancer and increased cancer risk, according to the study, published Dec 19, 2013 in the yearbook Genetics in Medicine napusak se bachane ke liya yoga tips ki jankari. Earlier this year, Jolie revealed that she had both breasts removed after knowledge that she carried a mutation in a gene called BRCA1 that is linked to soul and ovarian cancers.

Women with mutations in that gene and the BRCA2 gene have a five times higher hazard of breast cancer and a 10 to 30 times higher jeopardy of developing ovarian cancer than those without the mutations. For the study, researchers surveyed more than 2500 Americans. About 75 percent were knowing of Jolie's story, the investigators found keraxl hair growth serum coimbatore. But fewer than 10 percent of the respondents could correctly explanation questions about the BRCA gene modification that Jolie carries and the typical woman's risk of developing breast cancer.

So "Ms Jolie's strength story was prominently featured throughout the media and was a chance to mobilize health communicators and educators to train about the nuanced issues around genetic testing, risk and preventive surgery," study about author Dina Borzekowski, a research professor in the University of Maryland School of Public Health's area of behavior and community health, said in a university news release. However, it "feels similar to it was a missed opportunity to educate the public about a complex but rare health situation".

About half of the measure respondents incorrectly thought that a lack of family history of cancer was associated with a bring than average personal risk. Among people who had at least one close relative develop cancer, those who knew about Jolie's contact were less likely than those unaware of her story to estimate their own cancer gamble as higher than average, 39 percent versus 59 percent. That's a concern, another researcher said.

And "Since many more women without a forebears history develop breast cancer each year than those with, it is critical that women don't feel falsely reassured by a negative family history," den co-author Dr Debra Roter, director of the Center for Genomic Literacy and Communication at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said in the release release. The researchers also found that 57 percent of women who knew about Jolie's saga said they would have similar surgery if they knew they had a damaged BRCA gene.

Nearly three-quarters of women and men in the survey felt Jolie did the conservative thing by going public about her experience. Cases of breast cancer linked to a BRCA gene modifying are extremely rare. In the United States, a woman's risk of ever getting breast cancer if she does not have a BRCA transfiguration is between 5 percent and 15 percent man sexual penis treatment in karachi. While celebrities can help grow awareness of health issues by sharing their own experiences, it's important to help the special-interest group understand and use the information about diagnosis and treatment contained in these stories, the researchers concluded.

tag : cancer jolie breast percent health women public history researchers

Post a comment

Private comment



Dr. Alejandra Falto

Новые записи
Новые комментарии
Новые трэкбэки
Архив по месяцам
Форма поиска
RSS ссылка
Формуляр приглашения в блог-друзья

Добавить автора в блог-друзья