The Chest Pain And The Heart Attack

The Chest Pain And The Heart Attack.


For patients seen in danger rooms solely for breast pain, noninvasive screening tests may not always predict approaching heart trouble, a new study suggests. Such tests include: electrocardiograms, which magnitude the heart's electrical activity, echocardiograms, which measure how well blood is flowing in the heart using ultrasound, and CT scans of the heart. All three tests are recommended for box pain under current guidelines, the muse about authors said amma ni bath room lo denga. "It may be safe to defer early cardiac stress testing in patients with casket pain but no evidence of a heart attack," said lead researcher Dr Andrew Foy, an aide-de-camp professor of medicine and public health sciences at the Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center in Hershey, PA.



Foy doesn't muse these tests are overused, but may not be needed in all cases. "Furthermore, at cock crow cardiac stress testing appears to consequence in unnecessary, additional tests and invasive treatments". Around 6 million patients go to the difficulty room with chest pain each year in the United States. "Therefore, these findings could impact the tribulation of a large number of patients favstore.icu. Foy said that for patients with chest pain not brought on by a mettle attack, it seems safe to defer early cardiac stress tests.



So "We would interesting they follow up closely with their primary care provider or cardiologist for the best advice on what to do after chest pain. If the dolour returns, then cardiac stress testing may certainly be reasonable, depending on the nature of the pain and their other jeopardy factors for heart disease. The report was published online Jan 26, 2015 in the log JAMA Internal Medicine. For the study, Foy and his colleagues used strength insurance claims from a group of almost 700000 privately insured patients seen in emergency rooms for thorax pain in 2011.



From this group, they identified almost 422000 patients, of which more than 293000 did not receive noninvasive tests and penny-pinching to 128000 did. The most common test used was a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy - a examine that shows blood flow in the heart. According to Foy, the percentage of patients hospitalized for a pluck attack was only 0,11 percent a week after being seen in the emergency room and only 0,33 percent 190 days after being seen.



Patients who did not have endorse noninvasive tests were no more likely to have a heart attack than those who did pick up testing, the researchers found. Patients who received these tests, however, were more likely to have invasive procedures such as angioplasty. Yet these procedures did not put the odds against having a heart attack. In an editor's note that accompanied the study, Dr Rita Redberg, editor-in-chief of JAMA Internal Medicine, said such tests in low-risk patients are superfluous and keep up time spent in the ER. "It is point to change our guidelines and practice for treatment of chest pain in low-risk patients.



Such patients should be given a intense follow-up appointment with a primary care physician who can determine, based on the patient's condition, whether further judgement is necessary". But Dr Gregg Fonarow, a professor of cardiology at the University of California, Los Angeles, said since the analyse researchers looked back at patients who went to the emergency room and used figures from insurance companies, the true value of these tests can't be definitively determined homepage. Studies looking at patients in loyal time need to be done to identify the value of these tests for low-risk chest woe patients.

tag : patients tests heart chest attack cardiac stress testing medicine

Post a comment

Private comment

Профиль

alejandrafalto

Author:alejandrafalto
Dr. Alejandra Falto

Новые записи
Новые комментарии
Новые трэкбэки
Архив по месяцам
Категории
Форма поиска
RSS ссылка
Ссылки
Формуляр приглашения в блог-друзья

Добавить автора в блог-друзья